Book Report: The Man, The Myth, The Legend
Yes, I took this crummy photo, deal with it. From left we have Kentucky state Sen. Daniel Mongiardo, who almost beat Jim Bunning for the U.S. Senate last fall, Tony Miller, the congressional candidate from Louisville for whom I press secretaried last year, some woman I don't recognize, then another former employer, U.S. Senator and personal hero John Edwards, visiting Louisville for a rally and fundraiser and speaking with Kentucky state Sen. and all-around good guy Gerald Neal. Nice group of folks; plus, if you're wondering who Edwards is blocking in this shot, just know that I expect to write a disparaging essay about him next year. See, I love introducing new questions just as I'm answering others. I'll tell you what I mean.
I have yet to meet anyone who didn't enjoy the Harry Potter books. Sure I have met plenty of people who think the Harry Potter books are stupid, and the worldwide phenomenon thereof is pointless, but those people have never read Harry Potter. Everyone who's read them thinks they're great.
I think the naysayers expect something like this, a run-of-the-mill book about evil prophecies and the third full moon and the secret society of No One Gives A Shit. So believe me, I understand when you think this will be yet another book about the supernatural that's been so done to death that it's just impossible to care anymore, and the only people who would read it are people desperate for something similar to Harry Potter before the next Harry Potter comes out. If Harry Potter were like that, I'd be complaining too. Of course, I'd have tried reading one of the books first.
Fortunately, if you haven't read one of the books first, Harry Potter is better than you can imagine. The Harry Potter series, in a nutshell, is exactly what you wish fantasy books had been like when you were growing up. Sure, the magical elements always add to the plot and the atmosphere, never a quick trick created solely as a one-time plot device. In fact, as noted in a great New York Times review today, the Harry Potter series works because of its perfect combination of whimsy and humanity: how endless imagination is mixed with real life. You've got your hidden magical platform at King's Cross, a map that can tell you where everyone is in the castle, a hat that can peer into your soul, and both stairways and paintings that move, but you've also got dorm rooms, showing up for class unprepared, friends sulking at each other, unfair detentions and finally making the sports team only to lose the match when you fall off your broom and wake up in the hospital. J.K. Rowling isn't setting you up here for disappointment: the ominous-sounding titles aren't just dumb concepts made up to sound scary. Rather, each book is named after a central theme in a well-developed plotline that forces Harry into events and discoveries that increase his (and the reader's) understanding of the magical world and Harry's eventual showdown with an increasingly evil antagonist. Put another way, you're not getting ripped off here.
But more than anything, what I love about the Harry Potter books is how easily J.K. Rowling can embrace elements of fantasy with no apparent hindrance. I know if I were writing about an invented magical sport, or entire academic disciplines based on imaginary concepts, or even instantaneously appearing dinners, I would spend all my time hesitating about whether my ideas are creative enough or if I'm writing myself into a corner. Somehow, Rowling just seems to run with it and have the characters react as if they were normal human beings, leaving the rest (I assume) to a really terrific continuity editor. All told, the Harry Potter books are fun and inventive, but more than anything they're really fulfilling. If you've ever thought about ghosts, spells, or magicians, steaming cauldrons, forbidden woods, or mysterious evils, this is what you've been waiting for.
So that's why Harrison's being such an idiot. For everyone who didn't miss the train at 9 3/4, now we can discuss what I thought of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. First I'll run through my impressions of the previous five books, in relation to each other:
Harry Potter and the Sorceror's Stone: Great!
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets: Also great, but not as good as the first.
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban: Best one yet!
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire: Even better than the third. An exciting concept with a thrilling, completely unexpected ending that changed the way I anticipated the next three books.
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix: Okay, this one was disappointing; I thought Rowling made a major misstep with the plot here. Personally, I would have had the magical world react to the events at the end of the fourth book in a completely opposite way than they did, i.e. how they wound up doing by the beginning of the sixth book. We all knew we'd be going down this road eventually, so I thought these prevailing attitudes here made it kind of a waste of a book. This is the only time in the Harry Potter series where I've thought, "oh come on, let's get on with it." Also, you can't tell me this book wasn't too long.
So after Order of the Phoenix I was a mite concerned Rowling had lost her touch, and fortunately that's not at all the case. It's hard to say this early out whether Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince is the best book in the series to date, but darned if it isn't close. The plot, which again I thought had been stalled for a while, becomes genuinely intriguing almost immediately and goes strong the whole way through. The "who dies" issue basically went as it should have to set up the final book, but the way Rowling made it happen is just fantastic, raising more questions than it answers. I certainly can't wait for the final book, but I'm also thrilled I got to read this one. Harry Potter books are great.
I tell people that I liked The Da Vinci Code so much because Dan Brown does such a good job of continually resolving mysteries while introducing new ones and still leaving open the great central questions of his book until the very end. I should give Rowling credit for doing the same in the Harry Potter books too. In each episode we learn more about Harry or Voldemort or the secret past of major characters, all while the one-shot plotline of each book develops and ends. As a result, I leave every Harry Potter book glad I read it and eager to read more. What am I going to do after the next one?
Comments
Dude, Harrison is a total idiot for not reading the books. There is almost nothing better in this world than HP. If you don't try it, it's like not eating cheese or chocolate or never watching tv. Or for y'all, never trying a video game. Really, it just doesn't make any sense not to read the best books ever written.
btw Terry, Peter finished and thinks my theory is totally obvious and going to happen. You really should jump on board.
Posted by: Laura | July 24, 2005 12:28 PM
I am sorry I can't devote the time to reading books for eight year olds it would take to get through Harry Potter. I am too busy reading actual books, but as soon as I get through those and all the Curious George books, I will get to Harry Potter. It's a little-known fact that adults at one point actually read books for adults.
Posted by: Harrison | July 24, 2005 2:22 PM
1. Laura: I am on board, completely, I just feel like an idiot for not having seen it immediately like everyone else.
2. Harrison, thanks for not insulting my sister more explicitly, as I'm sure you were tempted to do.
3. Harrison, your comments make you sound more like an idiot than ever. "It's for kids" is a dumb argument, especially when the books are like 700 pages long. Also, the Harry Potter publishers do separate runs of the same book for kids and for adults. So shove it.
4. What kind of email address is @terryisgay.edu? don't you know they lost their accreditation?
Posted by: Terry | July 24, 2005 3:35 PM
So because it's long, it's aimed at adults? And because they market it to adults it's therefore written for adults? Let me tell all you liberal satanists about a long book aimed at kids and adults that the world would be better off if everyone read. That book is the Bible. It tells the story of a young man with long hair and some crazy ideas, and he didn't always do what people told him to, and that man's name was... I forget. But the point is... I forget that too. Hey, Terry, you know who I'm talking about. He drove that blue car.
Posted by: Harrison | July 24, 2005 4:28 PM
That's a very educational photo.
Posted by: Emily | July 24, 2005 6:13 PM
I think taking a while to accept an "unacceptable" truth (Wizard world in denial) is very typical of the adult world and was a frustrating, but completely necessary and realistic part of the story. Here is a great quote from a Deepak Chopra book "You will know a lot about human motivation once you realize one thing: ninety-nine percent of humanity spends ninety-nine percent of their time trying to avoid painful truths." People tend to believe what they want to believe, what supports their world view, and often only change under duress. Look at how the Germans supported the Nazis, Americans supported the Vietnam war. Also, adults bolster their egos by disparaging any wisdom that may come from the "mouths of babes", ie, who was going to believe Harry, a "child"? I think another powerful aspect to these books is that JK is gently satiring the adult world she has found herself in and people enjoy that.
Posted by: Ricki | July 24, 2005 7:53 PM
What the hell is an educational photo?
Posted by: Terry | July 24, 2005 8:48 PM
I have some not so great things to say about Gerald Neal.
Posted by: Molly | July 25, 2005 7:46 AM
What is the definition of an actual book if HP isn't one of them? Does it need to be something that only 18 and older can read? I think that's actually porn Harrison, but whatever floats your boat.
I just can't believe I missed this arguement. Damn bloglines for not showing me comments!!!
Posted by: Laura | July 27, 2005 11:19 AM
From Leaky Cauldron:
The Guardian has a look at the strong appeal of the Potter books for readers of all ages, as well as at others series often classified as 'children's books':
Although we can measure the size of the phenomenon by crunching numbers, that doesn't help us to understand why Harry Potter stands quite so large in our culture. And Harry is not alone - in a way his success only serves to echo and reinforce the equally unexpected breakthrough of The Lord of the Rings 50 years ago. That too was conceived for children but then came to define, in defiance of critical opinion, what many adult readers were looking for.
Posted by: Laura | July 27, 2005 12:48 PM